90% disabled Professor GN Saibaba and three fellow accused acquitted by Bombay HC on technical grounds; Supreme Court Saturday hearing puts pause
Perhaps the most unnerving development in the Indian judicial arena in October 2022 was the way a flicker of justice seemed to appear for the long-suffering professor GN Saibaba (as well as former JNU student Hem Mishra, Prashant Rahi and Vijay Tirkey), and then quickly snuffed out. In a surprise judgement, the Bombay HC acquitted them on technical grounds of an invalid sanction, but upon appeal by the State, the Supreme Court held an urgent Saturday hearing, a practice not usually reserved for such cases. In a widely criticized move, they put pause on the acquittal – citing the irrelevance of his 90% disability as it was the ‘mind’ that apparently is mostly involved in cases of conspiracy. Another co-accused, Pandu Narote had earlier died of swine flu this year in jail.
Bilkis Bano accused spent 1000 days on parole, booked in molestation case, released for good behaviour; petitions against release set to be heard on Nov 29
More information has emerged on the release of the accused in the Bilkis Bano case, with documents revealing that not only did many of the accused spend over 1000 days on parole, their release was opposed by CBI, India’s premier investigating agency, as well as the SP. Therefore, it was the Home Ministry’s direct intervention which led to the release on grounds of ‘good behavior’, a claim which was later exposed as it emerged that one of the accused on parole even got chargesheeted for sexual harassment.
New CJI DY Chandrachud appointed, to be sworn in on 9th Nov
Justice DY Chandrachud is going to begin one of the longer tenures of CJIs in recent history, with his swearing in ceremony set to take place on November 9th, 2022. Replacing Justice UU Lalit, whose term saw a flurry of activity of long-pending cases being revived as well as establishment of many constitutional benches, Justice Chandrachud enters with a liberal legacy of landmark cases in areas such as privacy, feminist jurisprudence, free speech, personal liberty etc. However, there is also scepticism from some corners as former president of the Supreme Court Bar Association, Dushyant Dave mentioned with the future CJI’s reluctance to sometimes take a bold stand in politically sensitive matters, pointing to his disappointing stance in the Haadiya case as well as in some tax matters. It remains to be seen, in very challenging times, what the future of the judiciary holds, particularly for minorities and other marginalised sections.